Divine Lifestyle
The Tribunal allowed both excise appeals of M/s Gahoi Tobacco Products Pvt. Ltd. and its ex‑Managing Director, setting aside the Commissioner’s de novo order on the ground of limitation and invalid service of show cause notice (SCN). Facts and background Service of SCN and limitation Decision Download Final Order Click Here For Other Legal Notes Click Here
The CESTAT allowed three connected appeals by Hemendra Rai, Rajiv Shewaramani and Aditya Gupta, set aside penalties imposed on them for alleged involvement in undervaluation of imported furniture via parallel invoices, as authorities improperly relied on retracted section 108 statements and un-certified email printouts without following sections 138B/138C procedures. Background Key Procedural Issues Reliance on…
The CESTAT allowed the appeal of Hanon Climate Systems India Pvt. Ltd., set aside the re-classification of imported aluminum tubes, pipes, profiles and RD tanks under CTH 8708, restored the original classification under CTH 7604/7608/7616, and quashed the duty demand under section 28(4), interest and penalties under sections 114A/114AA. Background Classification Dispute Goods Appellant’s Classification…
CESTAT New Delhi Principal Bench, in Final Order No. 50085/2026 dated January 20, 2026, allowed the appeal of Ms Mitsui Prime Advanced Composites India Pvt Ltd (Neemrana, Rajasthan) against service tax on ocean freight under reverse charge in CIF imports. The tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals), Jaipur’s order confirming tax, interest, and penalty. Background…
The Tribunal allowed the appeal of M/s Yash Oro India Pvt. Ltd., set aside the demand of customs duty, interest, redemption fine and penalty, and held that the importer could validly claim LDC exemption on gold dore imports under Notification 96/2008-Cus despite the DGFT licence mentioning Notification 12/2012/50/2017, as long as the licence itself remained…
Summary The order allows Bharti Airtel’s appeal, holds that the imported Juniper router cards are “parts” classifiable under CTI 8517 70 90, and sets aside the demand, interest, penalty, and extended limitation. Case background Goods and rival classifications Tribunal’s reasoning on classification Limitation, penalty, and demand Final operative order Download Final Order Click Here For…
WITHCIVIL APPEAL NO. 5294 OF 2008CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5627 OF 2008CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5278 OF 2008CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6679 OF 2008Civil Appeal No. 5273 of 2008 Page 2 of 44 J U D G M E N TSATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, J.
Comment– Supreme Court reviewed the order passed by the High Court of Delhi in a Bail Application in which Bail was granted to the respondent and the Narcotics Department appeared in appeal before Supreme Court. The Supreme Court heard the case and passed the remand order to send the case back to High Court with…
Comments- In the present case the offence was committed in year 2009 and the final judgement of the Supreme Court has come in the year 2024. It took almost 15 years long, judicial battle, and finally, the offender was awarded punishment of sentence of six month S.I. under section 304A of Indian penal code 1860…
Supreme Court rulings have had a profound impact on telecom stock volatility in India, especially related to the Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) dues dispute, which remains one of the most significant legal challenges faced by telecom operators like Vodafone Idea. Key Supreme Court Rulings and Their Impact on Telecom Volatility: Broader Market Reaction and Volatility…
